Posted on Feb 14, 2016 19:08
2 hours ago, Knob said:
I didn't activate an account to complain. The facts are that we as adults are not the only ones that look at the ranks and ask why. I challenge anyone on this post to logically argue why a ranked wrestler that consistently loses to another unbanked wrestler still is tanked. Do the home work or don't rank past 5.
Ok I will take a few precious free moments to waste my time on a response.
1 - first I challenge you to get yourself educated before you start this debate; you want to spout off with an attitude you better know what you are talking about
2 - you think you can do better then I challenge you to have at it; as many who try can tell you it ain't easy. Sure it sounds simple to say base it on results, but as you have already referenced not all coaches do a very good job of reporting results in a timely manner and even the guys who do this for a living will tell you results can often be very contradictory
3 - let me repeat something I often have to remind folks over the years. You remember the one good kid your kid has beat and conveniently ignore the losses such as unranked Grabow, Henry, Gadd, Andreoni, Seibert, Murrer on top of losses to #21 Husseini and #24 Caggiano. On top of that it looks like Manns is his only ranked win. Manns also has some unranked losses (including Lundy) but has multiple wins over kids who beat Lundy and a win over Metcalf
4 - bottom line if you don't like it don't read it