Accounts have been recovered and posting is enabled again. You must use the "Forgot Password" tool to reset your password for the new system. Contact me on the Facebook page if you have any issues.

Region 7 Tournament

Topic ID: 13495 | 59 Posts

Brackets are out on trackwrestling. I think Wayne Co./Madison Central duke it our for 1/2 and then in the next group you have Tates Creek/Henry Clay/Boyle Co./McCreary Central/Danville, not necessarily in that order. I haven't seen Madison Southern/Whitley Co., not sure what they have. Lafayette has a couple high level guys but not much depth this year. 

Link?  I can't seem to find it.

Search khsaa

Zeus,

I just googled up trackwrestling, used the search feature, and I only put in Kentucky (under state).

It had the Region 7 under the list (among others, but not hard to find) and I was able to browse the information from there. 

Hope that helps  (:

(Trackwrestling is squirrely when it comes to linking after getting to the event you've searched to. I've always had to restart from the search and never been able to link or bookmark a tourney directly.  This is definitely NOT a complaint, just my experience (: , i think it's something with the pages scripting or 'engine'  )

Thanks, I found it.  Track is great in that everything can be done in the same place, but it would be nice if they made it more user-friendly.

Been looking it over this morning, and here's my predictions.  

(# of wrestlers, # top 5 seeds, # top 4 seeds)

1.Mad central (14, 13, 10)

2.wayne co (13, 11, 10)

3. Mccreary (14, 7, 6)

4. Boyle (12, 6, 6)

5. Henry clay (11, 6, 4)

6. Danville (13, 4, 4)

 

Based it off number of kids per team and the seeds. 

2 hours ago, grimmnar said:

Zeus,

I just googled up trackwrestling, used the search feature, and I only put in Kentucky (under state).

It had the Region 7 under the list (among others, but not hard to find) and I was able to browse the information from there. 

Hope that helps  (:

(Trackwrestling is squirrely when it comes to linking after getting to the event you've searched to. I've always had to restart from the search and never been able to link or bookmark a tourney directly.  This is definitely NOT a complaint, just my experience (: , i think it's something with the pages scripting or 'engine'  )

http://www.trackwrestling.com/predefinedtournaments/VerifyPassword.jsp?tournamentId=253198009

You can find it by clicking on Information, then direct link (see attachment)

Screen Shot 2017-02-06 at 10.05.55 AM.png

Start time? Admission? Doesn't show that info on track.  

2 minutes ago, wrestlingmom said:

Start time? Admission? Doesn't show that info on track.  

Not sure admission cost, I'll ask today. 

Weigh in friday 530, hoping to start wrestling by 630-645

Weigh in 9 sat, wrestling 10:15

Of Topic again,

But thanks Confused Spectator ! :)    Not sure how I missed that part of the page, but I'll blame it on old age :) ! l

Love trackwrestling, looks like we got a tough 106 in Region 7. 

On Monday, February 06, 2017 at 1:12 PM, wrestlingmom said:

Start time? Admission? Doesn't show that info on track.  

Fri- $6 adults $4 students

Sat- $8 adults $5 students

 

Any predictions out yet? 

PREP WRESTLING: REGION 7 SEEDS

http://www.trackwrestling.com/predefinedtournaments/VerifyPassword.jsp?tournamentId=253198009

106 POUNDS
1. Thomas Deck, Madison Central, 9, 41-3
2. Mauro Lopez, Wayne County, 11, 41-4
3. Andres Calleja, Paul Dunbar, 12, 22-9
4. Ruben Martinez, McCreary Central, 9, 32-14
5. Hayden Sheroan, Henry Clay, 10, 22-12

6. Jaine Stephens, Whitley County, 10, 20-12
7. Patrick McMillion, West Jessamine, 10, 22-9
8. Melvin Call, East Jessamine, 8, 16-10

9. Hunter Missildine, Boyle County, 9, 17-11
10. Thomas Haggans, Lafayette, 8, 16-21
11. Brandon Bruner, Bryan Station, 8, 11-12
12. Bryce Towle, Tates Creek, 8, 6-9

113 POUNDS
1. Cagen Wallace, Wayne County, 11, 49-0
2. Morgan Sallee, Danville, 9, 29-7
3. Zach Cowan, Madison Central, 8, 7-2
4. Nathan Ainslie, Henry Clay, 9, 18-7
5. Waylin Dople, McCreary Central, 10, 30-16
6. Ross Hackenberry, Tates Creek, 9, 20-12
7. Stephen Watson, Whitley County, 8, 17-12
8. Charlie Habash, Paul Dunbar, 9, 6-6
9. Zach Taylor, West Jessamine, 11, 10-15
10. Zeke Slusher, East Jessamine, 10, 5-17
11. Kevin Quevedo, Bryan Station, 1-5

120 POUNDS
1. Tyler Storck, Henry Clay, 11, 25-2
2. Cauy Wallace, Wayne County, 9, 43-6

3. Jordan Bates, Boyle County, 10, 45-9
4. Michael Stephens, Whitley County, 10, 25-6
5. Aaron Johnson, Madison Central, 11, 18-19

6. Jeremiah Jones, McCreary Central, 10, 19-21
7. Tiffany Sullivan, Danville, 10, 4-2
8. Chris Verduzco, East Jessamine, 2-2

126 POUNDS
1. Jacob Dodd, Wayne County, 12, 43-1
2. Gentry Deck, Madison Central, 10, 42-3
3. Payton Watson, Whitley County, 11, 34-8
4. Jacob Robbins, Boyle County, 9, 26-15
5. Kevin Ensor, Tates Creek, 11, 22-19
6. Justin Chavez, Lafayette, 10, 10-17
7. Bryson Fields, Bryan Station, 6-12

8. Dylan isaacs, East Jessamine, 12, 2-4
9. Jordan Adams, Danville, 9, 7-13
10. Luke Anderson, McCreary Central, 8, 3-7

11. Tony Guerrero, Henry Clay, 10, 5-15

132 POUNDS
1. Jonathan Shepherd, Wayne County, 10, 27-5
2. Derrick Witmer, Boyle County, 11, 29-10
3. Will Kenney, Madison Central, 11, 28-14
4. Jayden Watson, Whitley County, 9, 29-13
5. Zachary Morgan, Tates Creek, 11, 28-13
6. Colin Silva, East Jessamine, 12, 13-10
7. Drew Adams, McCreary Central, 9, 24-23
8. Alex Chavez, Lafayette, 11, 15-16
9. Christian Poynter, Danville, 10, 14-28
10. Allan Friend, Paul Dunbar, 10, 10-20
11. Jaylin Harris, Henry Clay, 9, 11-24
12. Daniel Bruner, Bryan Station, 6-12

13. Justus Cornely, Madison Southern, 12, 5-28

138 POUNDS
1. JD Criswell, Wayne County, 12, 38-4
2. Justin Torgerson, Lafayette, 12, 6-1

3. Hayden Shepherd, Boyle County, 11, 18-7
4. Joey Stuart, Madison Central, 10, 30-18
5. John Cusson-Walker, Whitley County, 12, 21-16
6. Alex Spaulding, Paul Dunbar, 11, 13-10

7. Josiah Bertrand, Madison Southern, 11, 15-13
8. Elias Rodriquez, Tates Creek, 8, 14-13

9. Harrison Young, Danville, 8, 9-15
10. Ryan Pain, Henry Clay, 10, 9-17
11. Gunner Krupp, West Jessamine, 9, 6-12

12. Jason Lowe, Bryan Station, 4-10
13. Drew Bell, McCreary Central, 10, 2-5
14. Zac Pigg, East Jessamine, 10, 4-11

145 POUNDS
1. Ryan McManus, Madison Central, 11, 38-7

2. Kevin Vazquez, Lafayette, 11, 32-8
3. Logan Bertrand, Madison Southern, 11, 23-8

4. Issiah Isaac, Boyle County, 11, 35-13
5. Jarod Phillips, Wayne County, 10, 33-15
6. Johnnie Powers, Whitley County, 11, 11-5
7. Garren Moody, Danville, 11, 18-14
8. Caleb Bowling, Paul Dunbar, 9, 13-14
9. Fernando Munoz, Bryan Station, 5-8
10. Xavier Kramer, McCreary Central, 9, 10-24
11. Peyton Goble, West Jessamine, 12, 3-14
12. Dee Stone, Henry Clay, 8, 0-2

152 POUNDS
1. Daniel Baker, Madison Central, 11, 25-6
2. Jose Miduel, Wayne County, 12, 32-12

3. Christian Shelby, Henry Clay, 12, 26-10
4. Paul Webb, Boyle County, 10, 19-8
5. Nigel Lewis, Madison Southern, 11, 28-12

6. Myles Harris, Tates Creek, 10, 26-15
7. JC Diehl, West Jessamine, 11, 13-8
8. Donovan Lay, McCreary Central, 11, 22-15
9. Isaiah Scott, Danville, 12, 15-11
10. Clark Gookin, Lafayette, 10, 5-7
11. Zach Mills, Whitley County, 10, 6-11
12. Gary Adams, East Jessamine, 10, 5-13


160 POUNDS
1. Brady Gibson, Tates Creek, 11, 31-6
2. Ryan Strunk, McCreary Central, 12, 31-3
3. Dylan Mays, Madison Central, 12, 27-7
4. Donal Troxell, Wayne County, 10, 13-4
5. Daniel Wohlfarth, Whitley County, 12, 17-15
6. Ty Ezel, Madison Southern, 12, 15-14
7. Collin McGlone, Boyle County, 10, 21-23
8. Jack Burton, Paul Dunbar, 10, 10-12

9. Noah Rhode, Lafayette, 10, 17-25
10. Preston Sagastegui, East Jessamine, 10, 5-11
11. Peyton King, Bryan Station, 6-15
12. Morgan France, Danville, 11, 2-1

170 POUNDS
1. Nathan Prosser, McCreary Central, 11, 22-1
2. Johnnathon Todd, Madison Southern, 12, 29-9
3. Gavin Williams, Madison Central, 12, 12-4
4. Eric Bloh, Danville, 11, 35-13
5. William Lawson, Henry Clay, 12, 18-16
6. Colton Morrow, Wayne County, 10, 24-24
7. Garrett Belcher, Tates Creek, 10, 17-18
8. Treavor Garrett, Whitley County, 10, 17-18
9. DoRayquan Garrison, Lafayette, 11, 19-23
10. Justin Sheegog, Boyle County, 11, 9-17
11. Braden Ferguson, Bryan Station, 4-12

182 POUNDS
1. Don Harris, Danville, 11, 38-6
2. Zade Hawkins, Madison Central, 11, 35-11
3. Chris Dunagan, Wayne County, 10, 20-9
4. Conner Ball, McCreary Central, 11, 23-12
5. Stuart Branson, Tates Creek, 12, 17-12
6. Brandon Fields, Bryan Station, 19-10
7. Michael Walker, Whitley County, 11, 7-6

8. Lane Ezel, Madison Southern, 10, 10-14
9. Paul Brown, Boyle County, 8, 5-8
10. Jae Compton, Henry Clay, 12, 5-14
11. Dakoda Wagoner, West Jessamine, 10, 1-6

195 POUNDS
1. Ray Karl Irving, Henry Clay, 11, 15-3
2. Triston Conaster, McCreary Central, 10, 27-11
3. Brandon Vera, Bryan Station, 20-14
4. Cobey Blackwell, Boyle County, 11, 19-15
5. Trevor Reynolds, Madison Central, 10, 13-11
6. Justin Gray, West Jessamine, 12, 12-12
7. Gabriel Francis, Tates Creek, 9, 10-13
8. Caleb Campbell, Danville, 10, 17-22
9. Will Marshall, Lafayette, 11, 17-22
10. Caleb Shriner, Whitley County, 11, 4-8

11. Caleb Johnson, Madison Southern, 7, 4-18

220 POUNDS
1. Seth Anderson, McCreary Central, 11, 18-4
2. Mason Boggs, Lafayette, 11, 14-6
3. Jonathan Gregory, Wayne County, 10, 23-14
4. Jordan Aikhary, Madison Central, 10, 19-12

5. Angel Martinez, Tates Creek, 10, 11-10
6. Noel Martinez, Bryan Station, 8-9
7. Matt Copeland, Whitley County, 12, 12-4
8. Spencer Updike, Danville, 10, 27-18
9. Evan Scearce, Paul Dunbar, 10, 9-18

285 POUNDS
1. Justus Williams, Madison Southern, 27-1

2. Jonah Welch, Danville, 12, 20-2
3. Christian Denney, Wayne County, 10, 37-4

4. Marcelo Sierra, Tates Creek, 11, 27-12
5. Darius Allen, Madison Central, 12, 12-18

6. Allen Moore, Boyle County, 10, 13-8
7. Caleb Hunley, Lafayette, 9, 4-4
8. Noah Jones, McCreary Central, 10, 15-24
9. Giovanni Watson, Bryan Station, 5-10
10. Will Jones, Whitley County, 10, 8-19

 

Region7JPG.jpg

Region7PDF.pdf

Man he gotta work hard if he wanna make get on podium. Very tough class

How many round of Championships an Consolation will be wrestled Friday night?

4 hours ago, Fighting irish said:

How many round of Championships an Consolation will be wrestled Friday night?

2 rounds of championships.  1st rd and quarters

Looks like a tight 2 horse race.   Wrestle backs and bonus points will determine the winner.  5th place matches matter. 

Can anyone justify why Region 7 seeds every wrestler?  I would understand if trackwrestling sorted it all out for us but it just seems unnecessary and a waste of time.  I think to be seeded a wrestler should have to have a winning record to begin with, and the seeds should only go through the top 6.  An exception would be if a weight class doesn't have six wrestlers with winning records.  Then I think you use the criteria and include all wrestlers, but still only go through the top 6.

54 minutes ago, Zeus said:

Can anyone justify why Region 7 seeds every wrestler?  I would understand if trackwrestling sorted it all out for us but it just seems unnecessary and a waste of time.  I think to be seeded a wrestler should have to have a winning record to begin with, and the seeds should only go through the top 6.  An exception would be if a weight class doesn't have six wrestlers with winning records.  Then I think you use the criteria and include all wrestlers, but still only go through the top 6.

Several do this, not just region 7. I know 1,5,7 and 8 do. In a large region like ours, often you have winning record 10 or 12 kids deep. Seeding all the way out gives these kids a chance to seeding criteria to proprely be seeded. If not you might have kids that are say 25-12 who should be a 7 seed having to go against a 3 seed in the first rd. I've always been a fan of seeding all the way out because there is a better chance the top kids come out, as they should. 

And fyi, track does do this for us. It goes by criteria we set and if head to heads are entered properly, it takes those into account as well. Only slight changes need to be made for common opponents 

4 hours ago, Zeus said:

Can anyone justify why Region 7 seeds every wrestler?  I would understand if trackwrestling sorted it all out for us but it just seems unnecessary and a waste of time.  I think to be seeded a wrestler should have to have a winning record to begin with, and the seeds should only go through the top 6.  An exception would be if a weight class doesn't have six wrestlers with winning records.  Then I think you use the criteria and include all wrestlers, but still only go through the top 6.

I must admit, this is a first.  I've heard complaining about where a kid was seeded or how come they only seed top 4 or 6 or 8. But never this one.  Perfect example of no matter what you do someone will find something to complain about.  Hey kudos to all the coaches that dedicate their time to our boys and girls and spent the extra time to seed all the way through.  If your wrestler happens to be 16 out of 16, oh well.  Don't fault the coaches.  Use it as a teachable moment.

I'm sure this guy was 16 out of 16 his freshman year a time or two as well.Screenshot_20170208-123154.thumb.png.556

5 minutes ago, REscalera said:

I must admit, this is a first.  I've heard complaining about where a kid was seeded or how come they only seed top 4 or 6 or 8. But never this one.  Perfect example of no matter what you do someone will find something to complain about.  Hey kudos to all the coaches that dedicate their time to our boys and girls and spent the extra time to seed all the way through.  If your wrestler happens to be 16 out of 16, oh well.  Don't fault the coaches.  Use it as a teachable moment.

I know the reasoning behind not seeding all the way out by many coaches. The coaches with a lot of 1 and 2 seeds want first rd matches so they can get bonus points. In our Region there is 14 teams, so the 1 and 2 will never get a 1st rd match. Now with 2 top teams having a majority of 1 and 2 seeds, they rather not seed out so they can feed off the weak and rack up points. 

You lost me.  I would think a team with a lot of 1 or 2 seeds would want to seed all the way out so that they can have the 15 and 16 or 7 and 8.

9 minutes ago, coachteater said:

I know the reasoning behind not seeding all the way out by many coaches. The coaches with a lot of 1 and 2 seeds want first rd matches so they can get bonus points. In our Region there is 14 teams, so the 1 and 2 will never get a 1st rd match. Now with 2 top teams having a majority of 1 and 2 seeds, they rather not seed out so they can feed off the weak and rack up points. 

 

13 minutes ago, REscalera said:

You lost me.  I would think a team with a lot of 1 or 2 seeds would want to seed all the way out so that they can have the 15 and 16 or 7 and 8.

 

We only have 14 teams. So seeding 1- 14 will give the 1 and 2 a bye in 1st rd everytime. If 13 kids, 1,2, and 3 get byes. 

With random draw after say top 6, then 1 and 2 seeds can get matches in 1st rd and get more team points

Ex: Wayne co has 4 #1 seeds and 2 #2. If we random drew and they all got matches and pin, they'd earn 12 more team points then they can with the byes from seeding out1-14

OK, my bad.  I thought you were referring to a full bracket.  To your point,  the random draw can still leave a 1 or 2 seed without a match.  My point was not to say that seeding all the way through or random draw was better than the other.  I was just pointing out the obvious.  Someone is always gonna find a reason. 

2 minutes ago, coachteater said:

We only have 14 teams. So seeding 1- 14 will give the 1 and 2 a bye in 1st rd everytime. If 13 kids, 1,2, and 3 get byes. 

With random draw after say top 6, then 1 and 2 seeds can get matches in 1st rd and get more team points

 

46 minutes ago, REscalera said:

I must admit, this is a first.  I've heard complaining about where a kid was seeded or how come they only seed top 4 or 6 or 8. But never this one.  Perfect example of no matter what you do someone will find something to complain about.  Hey kudos to all the coaches that dedicate their time to our boys and girls and spent the extra time to seed all the way through.  If your wrestler happens to be 16 out of 16, oh well.  Don't fault the coaches.  Use it as a teachable moment.

Or I could have been asking for a clarification of why something is done the way it is, plus adding my opinion.  My original post is actually a perfect answer of why message boards exist.  Your response is a perfect example of someone jumping to conclusions instead of considering all reasons of why a person might ask a question.

25 minutes ago, Zeus said:

Or I could have been asking for a clarification of why something is done the way it is, plus adding my opinion.  My original post is actually a perfect answer of why message boards exist.  Your response is a perfect example of someone jumping to conclusions instead of considering all reasons of why a person might ask a question.

Negative ghost rider. You did not ask for clarification.  You asked for justification. Words have meaning. Don't fault me for reading your words as opposed to your mind.  Asking for justification is asking for a defense not seeking understanding.  

3 minutes ago, REscalera said:

Negative ghost rider. You did not ask for clarification.  You asked for justification. Words have meaning. Don't fault me for reading your words as opposed to your mind.  Asking for justification is asking for a defense not seeking understanding.  

I agree, while he may not have ment it to come across that way, I took it as defensive and negative towards seeding all the way out

8 hours ago, REscalera said:

Negative ghost rider. You did not ask for clarification.  You asked for justification. Words have meaning. Don't fault me for reading your words as opposed to your mind.  Asking for justification is asking for a defense not seeking understanding.  

I guess we can get hung up in semantics if you want.  Fact is, I didn't know why we seeded all the way out, so I asked.  Isn't the purpose of message boards to discuss things (ask questions, state opinions, etc.)?  Even though I now know the reason why it's done, I still disagree, which is fine; I don't think Coach Teater is going to get in my face about it on Saturday.  I didn't know you would be offended so easily...

No one's offended dude and I'm certain nobody will be getting in your face about this.  Thanks for your explanation on your poor choice of words. It's all good though.  Go Braves!!! 

8 hours ago, Zeus said:

I guess we can get hung up in semantics if you want.  Fact is, I didn't know why we seeded all the way out, so I asked.  Isn't the purpose of message boards to discuss things (ask questions, state opinions, etc.)?  Even though I now know the reason why it's done, I still disagree, which is fine; I don't think Coach Teater is going to get in my face about it on Saturday.  I didn't know you would be offended so easily...

 

Glad to hear since your original post gave me that impression.  Good luck to Union Co, although I'm not sure they'll need it.

I am glad this region went ahead and put the brackets out on track. Gives the wrestlers a chance to take a look early in the week and get their minds right. 

In my opinion, the championship is Madison Central's to lose. They're pretty solid from top to bottom with several potential champs, Decks, McManus, Baker, and Mays!

Of course Wayne county will be tough like usual and some of the Lexington schools like Tates Creek and Henry Clay always have competitive kids. 

40 minutes ago, hit-the-mat said:

I am glad this region went ahead and put the brackets out on track. Gives the wrestlers a chance to take a look early in the week and get their minds right. 

In my opinion, the championship is Madison Central's to lose. They're pretty solid from top to bottom with several potential champs, Decks, McManus, Baker, and Mays!

Of course Wayne county will be tough like usual and some of the Lexington schools like Tates Creek and Henry Clay always have competitive kids. 

I don't think it's quite theirs to lose, Wayne will be right there and it should be a battle. There is potential for multiple champs, but, decks will have tough finals matches against wayne kids, possible both could lose. Also McManus will be in a battle with Vasquez I'm guessing. I think baker wins, but mays may not even make the finals. Strunk in semis is tough, and gbison should be waiting in the finals, who's beat mays by pin and 7 this year. 

Should be a good weekend,  MadisonCental and Wayne will definitely be going for the title. Bonus points and even the 5th and 6th place matches will be needed to pull off a title

What happened to Odeh Eqal, Tates Creek 145?  Not showing in the bracket.

6 minutes ago, Fighting irish said:

What happened to Odeh Eqal, Tates Creek 145?  Not showing in the bracket.

That kid can wrestle and grow a heck of a 'stache.

Odeh is a very strong wrestler, and his beard game is unparalleled.

18 minutes ago, Fighting irish said:

What happened to Odeh Eqal, Tates Creek 145?  Not showing in the bracket.

Cheerleading nationals in florida. 

On 2/8/2017 at 9:53 AM, coachteater said:

Several do this, not just region 7. I know 1,5,7 and 8 do. In a large region like ours, often you have winning record 10 or 12 kids deep. Seeding all the way out gives these kids a chance to seeding criteria to proprely be seeded. If not you might have kids that are say 25-12 who should be a 7 seed having to go against a 3 seed in the first rd. I've always been a fan of seeding all the way out because there is a better chance the top kids come out, as they should. 

And fyi, track does do this for us. It goes by criteria we set and if head to heads are entered properly, it takes those into account as well. Only slight changes need to be made for common opponents 

I agree 100% I have always wanted to seed all the way down.  Kept getting voted out by those teams that want the bonus points. Heck we even voted if we should seed the 6th seed. 

On 2/8/2017 at 1:31 PM, REscalera said:

  Hey kudos to all the coaches that dedicate their time to our boys and girls and spent the extra time to seed all the way through.  If your wrestler happens to be 16 out of 16, oh well.  Don't fault the coaches.  Use it as a teachable moment.

Kudos exactly to many coaches just want to get home and not spend the time to get the brackets correct. 

I guess I don't think it's wrong for coaches to want to get home as soon as they can, this sport is grueling, which is why many choose to not coach anymore.  By the way, I'm not one of the coaches with a bunch of top-seeded wrestlers who's team would benefit from random draws after the top six seeds.  All year long we seed just the top four/six, and in my opinion we should just follow the same system instead of changing it up.

At the DI NCAAs they seed the top 12 and that's it.  Upsets are part of what makes the sport exciting.

Could you imagine a wrestler looking at his coach and saying that. "Come on coach, this sport is grueling.  I just want to get home tonight to watch some TV. "

A wrestler making that statement is referring to practice... seemingly endless repetition of technique, conditioning, lifting, etc., all the aspects that make this sport so special in teaching kids diligence.  For a young to middle-aged coach in a seeding meeting on a Sunday, it's more like, "I just want to get home to see my wife and kids that I don't get to see until 8-9 pm or later, six nights per week."  I know more than one coach who's given it up just to be able to spend more time with his family.

I can imagine a wrestler saying this though, and it's one if the reason so many quit.  But your example involves a kid who's not affected by the length of a seeding meeting, instead of a coach who is.  Make sure you're comparing apples to apples.  Many times the meaning behind the statement is more important than the words being used, a point I made about semantics earlier in the conversation.

5 hours ago, REscalera said:

Could you imagine a wrestler looking at his coach and saying that. "Come on coach, this sport is grueling.  I just want to get home tonight to watch some TV. "

 

Illegal move? Whatttttt??

25 minutes ago, Trell9998 said:

Illegal move? Whatttttt??

Enlighten us. 

Had wrestler slam another in 106 and they called it illegal but all coaches I've been hearing saying it was legit and gave other kid the win.

Stephens loses in 106

1st loss

Missilidine for Boyle loses in 106

these are 1st losses for them 

And I watched video of slam, it prolly was illegal 

How long is a dang pin? 3 secs or 1 one thousand? Just clarifying 

2 seconds in high school, 1 in college.

Man I'm seeing gotta be half second pins lol but was just an upset but don't know kids name.

And illegal moves get warning then DQ?

I believe the points aspect works like this, but am not 100% certain... an illegal move, such as a slam or full nelson, warrants the opposing wrestler a penalty point.  The second time is another point, the third time is two points, and the fourth time the offending wrestler is disqualified.

If wrestler A hits an illegal move, most commonly a slam, and wrestler B can't continue then wrestler A is disqualified no matter the score.  If wrestler B is losing badly, sometimes their coach will have their wrestler continue for just a second and then forfeit because of injury, so that wrestler A can advance because he's clearly better, but sometimes they don't.  However this is not required and is certainly a classy move on the coach's part.

The kid I guess was hurt or wind knocked out of him but went on and wrestled 2nd round. Call was up by like 4 or 5 pts I think. I just want to know what made the slam illegal so I can let him know why it was but all I have is live feed video on Facebook lol.

16 minutes ago, Trell9998 said:

The kid I guess was hurt or wind knocked out of him but went on and wrestled 2nd round. Call was up by like 4 or 5 pts I think. I just want to know what made the slam illegal so I can let him know why it was but all I have is live feed video on Facebook lol.

Slams are a judgement call. I did see the one you are referring to and in my opinion it was an illegal slam. When he makes the lift, its his job to bring him down in a safe way. It has to be controlled and the one on bottom needs to be able to protect themselve.    Just my 2 cents

17 minutes ago, coachteater said:

Slams are a judgement call. I did see the one you are referring to and in my opinion it was an illegal slam. When he makes the lift, its his job to bring him down in a safe way. It has to be controlled and the one on bottom needs to be able to protect themselve.    Just my 2 cents

Thanks, yeah you had front row seats lol...I'll tell him, it's his first year so still learning. I've heard 3-4 different reasons why.

Man seeing a lot of bad sportsmanship, not shaking hands, pushing folks off....craziness 

Jessamine has their first State wrestler, sucks it's his senior year already.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙