Posted on Mar 16, 2017 22:51
1 minute ago, Wrestling Dad said:
OK, I am a former collegiate wrestler myself, so I am no novice. Why in heavens name did they take ATM to the neutral position in the 3rd period? I'm sorry guys, that was a bad call by the Mizzou staff. Also, no combinations from shots. Good penetration a couple of times but a quick release and back out when a release up to a body lock or a drag or shuck instead of backing out might have yielded points. Zero points in 2 NCAA matches means work to be done on offense. Zero points in 14 minutes of wrestling against 2 guys NOT highly seeded means you retool your offense. As strong as ATM is no underhooks or body locks? It was hard to watch.
The coaching staff wanted him to go neutral in his previous match and he went against that, choosing down. Got turned and ridden. He listened to coaches this time around. All this is for naught if he scores one TD.
Were you able to watch the match? I am streaming on ESPN. Not much action out of either guy (obviously). Crawford is really tall, Myers not so much and had trouble getting in on Crawford. Announcers questioned the decision to take neutral as well. I don't know much about Crawford. Maybe he is a good rider. In any case, Crawford moved forward most of the match but I don't recall him taking a shot. Myers attempted a few shots, halfhearted at that. Weird in that Myers attempted more shots (not saying much as neither guy did anything), but Crawford took the center of the mat and came forward the entire time. Some crafty stalling in my opinion. Announcers critical of Myers lack of aggression in 3rd after taking neutral.