Posted on Mar 09, 2006 22:52
OK I have my picks but 1st I will give you my criteria.
This is based on what I have seen this last year, some of this comes only from the state tourney. I don't get to see as much as Ranger and some of the others on here.
I first came up with a criteria that goes like this.
"5" star == An excelant wrestler
"4" star == A great wrestler
"3" star == A good wrestler
"2" star == An above average wrestler
"1" star == An average wrestler
The toughest wt. class would have the highest number of 5 star wrestlers.
145 had 4 "5" star wrestlers.
152 had 2 "5" star and 11 "3" star
125 had 2 "5" star and 5 "3" star
189 had 2 "5" star and 7 "2" star
103 had 1 "5" star and 5 "4" star
215 had 1 "5" star and 4 "4" star
160 had 1 "5" star and 3 "4" star
112 had 1 "5" star and 3 "3" star
135 had 1 "5" star and 2 "3" star
140 had 6 "4" star
119 had 3 "4" star and 3 "3" star
130 had 3 "4" star and 3 "2" star
171 had 2 "4" star
Hwt had 4 "3" star
Most balanced
140 Had 6 "4" star and 5 "3" star. (By far the most balanced) went 12
deep. 4 non placers Golsby, Stewart, Knight, and Sheehan.
119
171
145
The rest are about equal